It is time to improve your IAM software program, however which safety instrument do you have to select? See how the options of CyberArk and BeyondTrust examine.
Selecting an identification and entry administration resolution is not any trivial activity. CyberArk and BeyondTrust use best-in-class applied sciences to guard methods, handle passwords and in any other case management and shield using delicate information.
SEE: Function comparability: Time monitoring software program and methods (TechRepublic Premium)
CyberArk is an data safety firm that gives IAM, PAM and safety options. These options stop unauthorized entry to important methods, handle passwords and monitor using delicate information.
Some key options provided by CyberArk embrace password vaulting, session monitoring, file integrity monitoring, safe distant entry and risk detection.
BeyondTrust is a safety firm that gives vulnerability administration, privileged account administration and information safety options. Its merchandise purpose to assist organizations safe their methods and information from inside and exterior threats.
Some key options provided by BeyondTrust embrace asset discovery, vulnerability evaluation, patch administration, password and credential administration, and privileged entry management. In addition they provide options for cloud and digital environments and cell units.
CyberArk vs. BeyondTrust head-to-head chart
Each CyberArk and BeyondTrust are highly effective, extremely rated methods trusted by customers. Each will present best-in-class IAM administration they usually have additionally each been labeled leaders throughout the trade by the Gartner Magic Quadrant.
|Privileged entry administration||✅||✅|
CyberArk vs. BeyondTrust options
Normally, CyberArk is account-focused, whereas BeyondTrust is asset-focused. This distinction in philosophy represents two notably completely different safety paradigms.
CyberArk’s account-focused strategy depends on privileged entry administration, account person habits and account privileges. For corporations whose customers carry accounts throughout a number of units, CyberArk’s strategy could also be extra acceptable. The agentless asset discovery can rapidly establish all property (together with units, working methods and functions) inside a corporation’s community. CyberArk will acknowledge as accounts signal on to new methods or units, to rapidly handle entry.
BeyondTrust’s asset-focused strategy depends on environmental scanning to safe the group’s digital property. This platform, which helps distant entry, provides agentless asset discovery to assist organizations stock their methods and perceive the place vulnerabilities could exist. BeyondTrust is asset-based—involved with the safety of particular person property.
In any other case, each CyberArk and BeyondTrust have related characteristic choices and benefits. Which resolution is finest on your group relies upon primarily on the property you might want to shield, the scale of your group and your group’s potential safety dangers.
Simplicity and ease-of-use
For newcomers, CyberArk has a considerable studying curve. Many small- to mid-sized organizations could discover themselves hiring an expert to deploy the answer somewhat than deploying it internally. Whereas documentation is on the market, it may be incomplete and inconsistent. A managed providers supplier could also be wanted for a corporation to transition to CyberArk.
Comparatively, BeyondTrust’s options are pretty easy to make use of and deploy. BeyondTrust has a wide range of options corresponding to Sensible Guidelines, Sensible Teams and Direct Join, all supposed to make the general person expertise of BeyondTrust simpler, thereby enhancing total productiveness.
Though CyberArk can theoretically handle as much as 100,000 endpoints, the utmost implementation in the true world is 57,000. Nonetheless, CyberArk is extra possible for use by enterprise-level organizations, whereas BeyondTrust is extra fashionable with small companies and mid-market enterprises.
CyberArk’s options, performance and complexity lend themselves higher to an enterprise-level group. In the meantime, BeyondTrust’s simplicity, ease of use and painless deployment make it a greater choice for smaller corporations and mid-sized organizations.
CyberArk’s net interface is wanting and the options and features offered via the net interface should not all the time the identical features which can be offered elsewhere—doubtlessly resulting in confusion, particularly when it comes to API configuration.
BeyondTrust supplies a clear, engaging HTML5 interface, though some customers discover it missing in additional superior options, corresponding to group approval. Whereas the BeyondTrust interface could not have as sturdy a characteristic set as CyberArk, it’s simpler to make use of.
Selecting between CyberArk vs. BeyondTrust
CyberArk and BeyondTrust are pretty evenly matched IAM options which have quite a bit going for them. At this time, BeyondTrust is the main competitor throughout the discipline, however CyberArk is shut behind.
Select CyberArk if:
- You want a complete IAM resolution that may assist on-premises, hybrid and cloud environments.
- You want an IAM resolution with built-in privileged entry administration capabilities.
- You’re occupied with an IAM resolution that places account administration and account safety first.
- You aren’t afraid of an IAM resolution with complexity.
Select BeyondTrust if:
- You want an IAM resolution specializing in safe distant entry and compliance with regulatory requirements.
- You want an IAM resolution with sturdy vulnerability evaluation and patch administration options.
- You’re occupied with an IAM resolution that places asset administration and asset safety first.
- You want an answer quick and simple to deploy.
Finally, CyberArk and BeyondTrust are highly effective IAM options that may assist organizations handle their important property and shield in opposition to information breaches. When selecting between CyberArk and BeyondTrust, take into account your group’s wants, necessities and sources first.